|
|
Saturday, February 01, 2003 |
Languages.
After my last post, I gotta calm down/switch gears. Hmm. Learning Ruby, I gotta say that I don't think you're pushing your boundaries. Want to learn something new and truly mind-expanding? Go find Ernest Friedman-Hill's Jess system. Read the manual, think hard, and you'll find out where computer science is going in the long run. Yes, he's created a CLIPS system for Java, and perhaps that on its own is not worthy of what I've just said. But when you start thinking about what you can accomplish with it, and what happens when you attempt to create aspect-based systems and couple them with rule programming, you get to a very interesting place. I've been in this game a long time (17 years) and that combination represents the first truly new thing I've been exposed to in some time. 4:16:19 PM |
What are we doing?
Ted's right -- we need to get back out there. I've often asked myself over the past few years a question: What is this country trying to do? If you don't live in the US, feel free to ask yourself the same question about your own country. Are we trying to create peace and prosperity? Are we trying to make our citizens happy? Those are such internal goals. Should not the desire of a great society be to build something of beauty, expand the knowledge of the world, or discover a new truth? So enthralled are we with the twin notions of obedience and prosperity that we have forgotten the essential core of the human spirit, that which I believe justifies our existence -- our ability to surprise God and expand the boundaries of what we know and achieve. There is an 8 year old boy without a mother, in Racine, Washington, because our politicians felt that saving a few dollars was more important than safety protocols that would have kept his mother alive. Seventeen years ago, a teacher's family lost their mother because a subcontractor falsified test documents to avoid cost overruns. Seven remarkable human beings are dead because we don't have our priorities straight. That's you and me, and the people who represent us. We're about to spend somewhere in the neighborhood of $200 billion crushing the leadership (and hopefully only the leadership) of a small country in the middle east. Is there not another way? Billions of dollars go, in farm subsidies, not to support our nation's farmers, but to prop up the massive agricultural companies that rob them of their lives' work. Here in DC, the leaders of the local teacher's union gleefully robbed their membership of their dues money, using it to buy themselves whatever they felt like. They, in particular, had no concept of consequence. What has happened to ethics? What has happened to responsibility? We so often declare a "moral person" to be someone who takes certain stands on certain issues -- the unsolvable issues, the ones that don't actually matter. I think the ethics of our interactions with other people, and with society as a whole, are the next frontier of human awareness. Without finding the right way to live together, to work out our differences, to be good to each other, we will not survive. It is time that we declare that lack of regard for known consequence is a prime failing, and try to better ourselves. Have we dug too deep of a hole? You -- the politicians who axed NASA's budget. Did you care how the money was spent? Were you concerned at all with what was being accomplished? Were you just trying to eliminate an annoyance, an easy target? Were you being political when you voted to slash the budget? You now reap the deadly and tragic consequences of your decision. 4:08:23 PM |